EDITORIAL QUESTIONS
What must the story answer?
- Which DPDP provision is actually relevant to the AI claim?
- Is the source law, policy, consultation, research or commentary?
- What implementation indicator is being mistaken for a legal duty?
TOPIC DESK / Frontier
AI and algorithmic accountability
Map DPDP provisions to AI discourse without inventing obligations specific to AI.
BEAT BRIEFING / EDITORIAL WATCH DESK
Questions before coverage.
A useful beat starts before its first article: it states what editors must prove, what they must not infer and which neighbouring desks add context.
EVIDENCE GATE
Required before publication.
- Exact DPDP provision and commencement status
- Primary official policy or consultation record where cited
- Academic or technical analysis labelled by observable source type
REPORTING BOUNDARIES
What this desk will not claim.
- Do not invent AI-specific obligations under the DPDP framework.
- Do not convert policy discussion or technical practice into operative law.
AVAILABLE RECORDS
Awaiting source-backed coverage.
No placeholder story, unnamed expert or invented implementation claim is used to fill this space.
FAIL-CLOSED COVERAGE STATE
Ready for evidence, not a placeholder.
Live collection is disabled. This desk opens only after the following evidence can retain its original link, source category, legal-status note and corrections path.
- 01Exact DPDP provision and commencement status
- 02Primary official policy or consultation record where cited
- 03Academic or technical analysis labelled by observable source type